Google on the Warpath
October 24, 2007
Google has always been against paid links and the idea of selling Page Rank. Recently they have become more aggressive in lowering the Page Rank of sites that sell paid links.
Take for example Text Link Ads. This service, which matches link sellers with link buyers, has been removed from the Google search indexes. The only way for them to get included in Google’s search results is by buying ads via Google AdWords.
One of the biggest “Make Money Online” blogs, Johnchow.com has seen his Page Rank drop from a six to a four over the last few weeks. John has had other problems with Google in the past. Earlier in the year he ran a “review me for a link” program that he used to Google Bomb himself to the top of the “Make Money Online” search result. Afterwards Google dropped him from their index. If you do a search for “John Chow” you will not see his website.
In a recent article on Search Engine Land Danny Sullivan pointed out some of the extreme cases of Google penalizing a site for selling links. The most prominent example is the Stanford Daily News that went from a PR9 to a PR7.
Because Page Rank is owned by Google it is completely up to them how they assign it to websites. However, by making the existence of Page Rank public and telling webmasters how it works they create a situation where people will want to use that system to increase the traffic to their sites or the income from their sites. Google could very quickly kill the incentive to sell paid links to pass on Page Rank simply by making Page Rank an internal only metric. If no one knows what their Page Rank is no one will be able to game the system or sell paid links based on it.
Google is completely within its rights to penalize the Page Rank of any site it chooses for any reason it chooses, however, removing a site from the search index is not a good idea. If I am searching for something specific (text link ads) and the site does not come up on top I am going to suspect a problem with Google’s ability to search the web and deliver to me relevant results. If Google were a search company they would care about this. Sadly, Google is not a search company, they are an advertising company that tells people it is a search company.
Keep your eyes open if you follow SEO and Page Rank, some of my sites have just been hit with Page Rank updates and the ones that sold Paid Links all suffered.
- Here is a short list of those who have experienced a rapid PR drop:
- Statcounter PR10 -> PR6
- Forbes PR7 -> PR5
- SF Gate PR7 -> PR5
- Washinton Post PR7 -> PR5
- Engadget PR7 -> PR5
- Search Engine Guide PR7 -> PR4
- Search Engine Journal PR7 -> PR4
- Technosailor PR6 -> PR3
- Search Engine Roundtable PR6 -> PR4
- Problogger PR6 -> PR4
- Copyblogger PR6 -> PR4
- Blog Herald PR6 -> PR4
- Joystiq PR6 -> PR4
Data is checked via UrlTrends and Smart PageRank
For further reading I suggest you go to Andy Beard’s blog and Daily Blog Google Tips
Update
A reader emailed me to suggest that part of the Google Page Rank change may be attributed to Netscape Propeller. When they did the move several weeks ago they went from a PR 9 site to a PR 0 site. All links coming from Netscape have now been adjusted to be worth 0PR. How many of the sites suffering now were high profile on the old Netscape?
Written by Steve D · Filed Under Internet
[…] D. at TechVat has more on the PageRank issue, including a list of sites that have seen their rank decrease — and it’s a list that includes some well-known […]
[…] fair and won’t have SEOs mess with it. Maybe it is just a happy coincidence, but according to this list on TechVat, the sites hit the hardest by this update are focused on the dark art of […]
[…] I’m once again not the only one. Google is on the warpath, but it’s not limited simply to sites doing sponsored reviews. Unfortunately, for those who […]
I suffered a drop from PR6 to PR3 and I have no Propellor links.
[…] TechVat […]
[…] Ich bin nicht der einzige, dem es so geht. Golem ist jetzt auch nur noch 4, ebenso wie Basicthinking und erstaunlicherweise der Cappellmeister. Na vielleicht ist das ein Geburtstagsgeschenk, wer weiß. John Chow ist ebenfalls von 6 auf 4 gefallen … und sogar Engadget hat es erwischt (von 7 auf 5). Mit Linkverkäufen kann das nichts zu tun haben, denn auch der Problogger wurde von 6 auf 4 herabgestuft, genauso wie die Washington Post von 7 auf 5, usw … eine größere Liste von Herabstufungen gibt es z.B. bei Dailyblogtips.com oder auch hier bzw. hier. […]
I got hit by the Page Rank — from PR5 to PR4 — and I don’t sell or buy paid links. I’m looking for paid advertising, though, although nobody has taken me up on that yet. I also use Adsense, but they can hardly penalize me for that so what happened?
I heard that PR might drop as well because if other sites get a lower PR who link to your site, it will affect your PR as well. Is this true? Hope so because otherwise I’m furious with Google.
Moreover, if anyone can report a site for malicious reasons and Google mistakingly listens to them, what can we do to get them to correct their error?
Thanks in advance.
If you go into Google’s webmaster tools area of your Google account you can contact them and ask them to look at your site again.
I look forward to the day when Page Rank goes away. As long as it exists advertisers will use it when deciding how much to pay for ad rates on a site. I do not like knowing that part of my income stream is controlled by an advertising company.
Selling and buying links just to improve page rank should be banned all together. Business owners should purchase links from sites that actually receive visitors looking to buy a certain product. One of my sites is used to connect businesses with each other.